Not everybody has $100 to throw around, and not everybody has the same priorities. Not everybody is looking for the most accurate colors or even cares enough. My only point is that each display technology has its own pros and cons. I personally prefer IPS monitors because of the brighter colors, but that doesn't mean it's for everybody. But IPS is the most important.' Like, you don't even know what the hell he's looking for. The guy asked for resources to learn about monitors, and you literally said 'IPS is the only thing that matters. You're right that we aren't in the same ballpark, because you've got the mindset that literally the only thing that matters is color reproduction.

I also think you are vastly underselling just how much $100 is.

If you're talking about this or anything similar, then you completely ignored the second point I made about misleading response times in IPS monitors. But ask any questions I'll try to answer. You can get a 1440p 1ms 144hz for about the same price (such as this )Įr.I'm not a detail obsessive user, I just want stuff to work how it should, so I don't have much more insight than that. However, it's def not a first choice for gaming, both due to ghosting and 60 hz refresh. It's not horrible, not even that bad or distracting, but definitely noticeable compared to a higher refresh 1440 screen.įor $210 (or the $160 it was for sale at briefly) I think it's amazing for the crisp 4K dpi and IPS image quality. Seems prone to tearing despite adaptive sync, and it blurs a fair ammount. I like that it's 28 instead of 27' like a lot of panels in this category.Īs far as gaming is concerned, again, beautiful image until you have motion, whether scrolling or panning in an FPS. I don't like what the HDR setting does to the colors so I'm not using it. I got this deal last week and am using this monitor right now w a 1070ti.

Acer nitro xv272u microcenter